Daniela Amodei from Anthropic Predicts Market Will Favor Secure AI Solutions

The Trump administration may view regulation as a barrier to the AI sector, but a major player in the industry disagrees.

During WIRED’s Big Interview event on Thursday, Anthropic president and cofounder Daniela Amodei shared with WIRED editor at large Steven Levy that, despite David Sacks, Trump’s AI and crypto czar, claiming her company orchestrates a “sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based on fear-mongering,” she believes that Anthropic’s dedication to addressing AI risks is fortifying the industry.

“From the start, we’ve been clear about the enormous potential” of AI, Amodei noted. “Our goal is for everyone to recognize the positive impacts and advantages that AI can offer, but achieving that requires us to manage the associated risks effectively. That’s why we emphasize these conversations.”

With over 300,000 startups, developers, and organizations utilizing some form of Anthropic’s Claude model, Amodei stated that her interactions with these clients have shown that, while they desire powerful AI capabilities, safety and reliability are equally paramount.

“No one requests a product that is any less safe,” Amodei remarked, drawing a parallel between Anthropic’s transparency regarding its model’s limitations and a car manufacturer releasing crash-test data to demonstrate safety enhancements. While it might be startling to view a crash-test dummy exiting a car window in footage, knowing an automaker improved safety features based on that test could persuade a consumer to choose that vehicle. Amodei emphasized that the same principle applies to companies utilizing Anthropic’s AI products, creating a market that inherently encourages regulation.

“We are essentially establishing a baseline for safety simply by what we introduce into the market,” she explained. Companies “are integrating many daily workflows and tasks around AI, and they recognize, ‘This product has fewer hallucinations, produces less harmful content, and avoids many of the pitfalls.’ Why would they opt for a competitor that performs worse?”

Photograph: Annie Noelker